When it comes to the portrait of Dracula on film , Bela Lugosi started the cape - wearing castle - dwelling aura   in his 1931 movie , Dracula . His Dracula is debate one of thebest of the Universal Monsters .   Francis Ford Coppola mould Gary Oldman as the bloodsucker in his 1992Bram Stoker ’s Draculaand the worker hand his performance some squeamish touches , but come down prey to overacting . However , there are two actor who carry the persona to new heights with their respective films .

In the ' 60 and early ' 70s , Christopher Lee intermit cinematic tabu as the most unequalled Dracula to date . In 1979 , Frank Langella took his Broadway portrayal to the cinema withJohn Badham ’s Dracula . Each actor bring in something unique to the role , making their interlingual rendition of the bloodsucker arise above the rest .

Langella Explored The Love Inside Dracula

Frank Langella had only one shot at portray Dracula on celluloid and he border on the part with the dedication of a method role player . Langella tally to sign ontodirector John Badham ’s only Horror film , 1979’sDracula . His stipulations were that he would n’t have to wear fangs , and   he ’d allowed to   search Dracula ’s soulfulness .

The tragic , centuries - old romance that defines Count Dracula was an player ’s dreaming , as W.D. Richter ’s screenplay dove deep into Dracula ’s need for a love long lost . Langella transude the tragedy and loss in the character , wreak a unequaled touch to the carrying into action .

Lee Used His Eyes To Great Effect

Christopher Lee was classically trained and played many of Shakespeare ’s fully grown case on stage , but it was the repulsion music genre that gave Lee his big success on film . When the actor was called to bet Count Dracula in Terence Fisher ’s 1958 Hammer - producedHorror of Dracula , it would be the role that would make Lee an international star .

Along withhis unique baritone voice voice , one   of Lee ’s gravid strengths when play the Count was how he used his eyes . There was so much that the histrion hold behind those middle . Depending on the scene and the bit , Lee masterfully portrayed the right emotion , sometimes welcoming or seductive , but always let   audiences see the baleful intent behind Dracula ’s eyes .

Langella Wasn’t Afraid To Show Dracula’s Vulnerability

Count Dracula is one of the most terrific villains in all of repugnance pic history . Besides of his aversion to crosses , garlic , and sunlight , he has always been portrayed as middling invincible .

Frank Langella prefer to show a more vulnerable vampire . The Count still hurts from having lost the great love of his life and , in Langella ’s film , some of Dracula ’s decision are mislead due to his desire to find the soul of his lost first mate . Langella ’s Dracula is a man searching for a love to share timelessness with and the actor uses his face and tonic fracture to evince a Dracula weight down by his need .

Lee Made Dracula Frightening

Bela Lugosi fright audiencesback in the thirties but today he is more style than creepiness . When Cristopher Lee don the cape and fangs for his first film in 1958 , he remembered to scare his audience .

Lee used his motility and tower presence to send chills through the audience . The way he held his mantle , the way he would put his victim in a enchantment , and how he would stand I. F. Stone - still in the bound of the physique like a sinister ghost made his Dracula , to this day , one of the most frightening andpowerful vampire on film .

Langella Played Dracula On Broadway

Frank Langella was already a successful Dracula on Broadway , as was Bela Lugosi at the clock time . Tony - nominated for his work , it would still be a challenge to successfully transform his performance , and the romp itself , to the heavy filmdom . The doer worked closely with director John Badham to make the film something extra .

The two vow to stick as close as they could to Bram Stoker ’s original novel while make the modification they call for . The film was n’t a big hit but critics were very tolerant and praised Langella and Badham for successfully translating the Broadway show to shoot .

Lee Had A Commanding Presence

Christopher Lee was very tall . At 6'5 " the actor predominate over most of his carbon monoxide - virtuoso . When he play Dracula , he was significantly grandiloquent than everyone , and the studio apartment on purpose retch actors under 6 ft to further present the menace of Count Dracula .

In each of his Dracula films , one of the greatest strengths wasChristopher Lee ’s command and command presence . In all of his Dracula films , Lee used his height and stare and voice to control every second he was on silver screen .

Langella Knew How To Make An Entrance

While Lugosi strode into the frame and Christopher Lee would appear in the background before fully bring out himself , Frank Langella used his whole body to move into a setting .   A classically trained level actor who had a swashbuckler ’s physique , Langella ’s effortless and almost balletic movement when entering a elbow room and/or a panorama would add to Dracula ’s mystique .

Sometimes he would almost glide   into   the frame while other entrances would be more physical , including his first visual aspect as Dracula rides up to the camera , at first silhouetted and then majestic and urbane . Every entrance from Langella ’s Dracula enhanced the already classically - styled adjustment .

Lee Brought A Sensuality To Dracula

One thing previous incarnations of Dracula never explored was the vampire ’s sensuality . Hammer Studiosbrought heavy sensualness and more blood to the   best of their horror adaptations . For Dracula , the sensualness is work up into Bram Stoker ’s original novel and the studio apartment pounced on it .

Christopher Lee would make women with not only his trance but his pure sensualness . The histrion sure enough had sexual urge entreaty and it was easygoing to believe that his victims would come to him so easy . Lee used his natural physical allurement to neat usance for his time as Count Dracula .

Langella Oozed Sexuality

If it was Christopher Lee who brought out the sensualism in Count Dracula , it was Frank Langella who devote the bloodsucker full - blown sexuality appeal .

Director John Badham allow the seduction vista to be bath in a sexual heat that make the film to receive its " radius " evaluation . With his easygoing and seducing vox fuse with his piercing eyes and open shirts   present his well - sculpted chest ,   Langella bring out arrant gender that other Dracula films and actors never full search .

Lee Showed Dracula As A Monster

In   many incarnations of Count Dracula , fans seem to forget one significant matter : Dracula is a monster . Vampires are no longer human . They are the undead . Creatures . Ghouls . Pure lusus naturae .

Christopher Lee choose to remember this in his portrayal . In a couple of his Dracula moving picture , he said nothing but alternatively only grimaced and growled . In one vista Lee ’s Dracula even howl as he aggress . Lee ’s Count almost always has origin dripping from his fangs and during some attack , his eyes get blood red .   His Dracula is vicious and red and , above all else , is a true a devil .

NEXT : The 5 Best & 5 Worst Movies Elvira Curated

How Rachel Zegler’s

The Thunderbolts looking up and looking shocked in Thunderbolts

Ben Affleck as Christian drumming his hand on the table while talking to Cynthia Addai-Robinson’s Marybeth in The Accountant 2

Langella-Lee-Feature-Image

Langella-Explored-The-Love-Inside-Dracula

Lee-Used-His-Eyes-To-Great-Effect

Dracula looks at a cross in Dracula

Christopher Lee hissing in Dracula Prince Of Darkness

Langella-Played-Dracula-On-Broadway

Lee-Had-A-Commanding-Presence

Langella-Knew-How-To-Make-An-Entrance

Lee-Brought-Sensuality-To-Dracula

Langella-Oozed-Sexuality

Christopher Lee in Dracula Prince of Darkness

Movies