Finding Dory
Over a decade after breaking new ground with his reanimate masterpieceFinding Nemo , Andrew Stanton returned with a sequel , Finding Dory , that shift the direction onto everyone ’s favorite amnesiac blue tang as she adjudicate to find her long - recede parent . Like many Pixar sequel , Finding Dorywas a mixed bag , but generally satisfying .
Upon its release in 2016,Finding Dorymade a carload of money , topping the original and breaking the $ 1 billion Deutschmark to become the highest - grossing animated moving picture at the North American box office ( by and by break by another Pixar sequel , Incredibles 2 ) . Despite this popularity , the movie has some flaws .
Right: Telling A New Story
FromDie Hard 2toThe Hangover Part IItoHome Alone 2 : lose in New York , when it comes to making sequels , filmmaker can often rehash the premiss of the original in lieu of coming up with a raw level . The most obvious approximation for a sequel toFinding Nemowould involve Nemo somehow move missing again .
So kudos to Andrew Stanton for coming up with a new narration . This fourth dimension , Dory goes missing and it ’s not an chance event — she runs off to retrieve her parent .
Wrong: Smaller Scale
The Pixar squad brought the oceans to life inFinding Nemo . The movie had an epic scale , taking audiences from Nemo ’s quaint coral home plate to the mystifying depth of the ocean and back again . Marlin and Dory travel through swarms of Portuguese man-of-war , twit the East Australian Current , contended with shark and got eaten by a blue whale .
By line , the fact thatFinding Doryis mostly trammel to the Marine Life Institute feels like a step backwards . It ’s like if afterStar war ’ intergalactic adventures , The Empire Strikes Backwas set wholly on the Hoth base . Sequels commonly go bigger , butFinding Dorywent agency small .
Right: New Character Additions
No role player in the world was going to turn down an go to come along in theFinding Nemosequel , so Andrew Stanton was capable to find the perfect mortal to meet each new graphic symbol , and many of the Modern plus to the roster are great .
There are Diane Keaton and Eugene Levy as Dory ’s parents;It ’s Always Sunny ’s Kaitlin Olson as a short - sighted heavyweight shark;Sigourney Weaveras herself;The Wire ’s Idris Elba and Dominic West as a pair of sea lions ; andModern Familyalums Ed O’Neill and Ty Burrell as a ill-humoured octopus and a dim - witted beluga giant , respectively . Indeed , Finding Doryis sate with delightful character additions .
Wrong: Repeating Jokes From The First One
A lot of the gags fromFinding Nemo , like Dory ’s belief that she can communicate with whales , got retell to less effect inFinding Dory .
This is a common problem with comedy sequel . Instead of coming up with raw jokes for their case , the same caper from the first one are just repackaged .
Right: Lots Of Heart
Not everything inFinding Doryworks , but its heart is always in the right place . walleyed pike ’s reunification with her parents at the end of the movie is one of Pixar ’s all - time sweetest moment .
The opening flashback in which Dory grow up wander aimlessly through the ocean , need for help finding her kin , is n’t as heartbreaking as the original ’s barracuda approach opening , but it ’s still reasonably sad .
Wrong: Broader Humor
The funniness inFinding Nemois smart and sharply written , but the clowning in its sequel went a bunch broad and silly . There were slaphappy moments inFinding Nemo , of course of action , but it was n’t the movie ’s preside comic sensitiveness . InFinding Dory , it is .
WhileFinding Nemois a choice example of a Pixar masterpiece thatcan be enjoyed by audiences of all ages , retrieve Dorywas made more for the kids than their parents .
Right: Dory’s Backstory
Since Dory just bumps into Marlin inFinding Nemoand does n’t know anything about herself , the audience does n’t hump anything about her , either . This paved the way forFinding Doryto fill in her backstory , but it could ’ve easily been unsatisfying .
Luckily , Andrew Stanton managed to give Dory a backstory that delight buff of the character and fit in neatly with the modified information we knew about her from the first movie .
Wrong: Slow Pacing
The originalFinding Nemomovie move at a rapid tread . minute after Bruce the shark ’s introduction , he got a taste for lineage and tried to pig Marlin and Dory . As presently as they come in the deep , dark depth of the ocean , they were assault by an anglerfish .
alas , Finding Dorydidn’t maintain this pace . The movie is unbelievably slow , weave from placed opus to set musical composition with only the brief glimmers of excitement and suspense .
Right: The Big Finale
While the secret plan ofFinding Doryis disappointingly lowly - scurf , the finale is a big , merriment , frisk spectacle . Dory hijacks a truck , drives it around a busy highway , and then jumps it off a cliff and crashes it into the sea , freeing all the marine lifetime inside .
The slow - motion afford the audience enough clip to spot all the screaming little item , while Louis Armstrong ’s “ What a Wonderful World ” furnish the staring soundtrack for the view .
Wrong: Forced Message
Despite being plant under the sea , there was a heartwarming relatability inFinding Nemobecause it explored every parent ’s worst nightmare — lose their child — and the lengths that one forefather will go to to get his son back . The message about the advantages and disadvantages of overprotective parenting was universally applicable .
However , the substance inFinding Doryis less clear . It has something to do with image out a place to call home and a sense of residential district , but it was a wad more switch - on and disingenuous than the subject matter inFinding Nemo .
NEXT : Incredibles 2 : 5 thing The Sequel aim Right ( & 5 It Got Wrong )
