Spider-Man 3
The most unneeded villain in Sam Raimi’sSpider - Man 3wasSandmanand not Venom . The devotee - favorite symbiote scoundrel was tally to the film despite Raimi ’s preference to habituate Vulture at the behest of Sony ’s Avi Arad . It was believed that Raimi had lean too heavy on the Spider - Man villains that he favor over the I that Spidey fans were drawn to . The result , as Arad and Raimi have both admit since , was a mess that painfully speculate the director ’s apathy to the studio apartment ’s originative direction .
Released on the back of the genre - delineate andadoredSpider - Man 2,Raimi ’s ambitious threequel sought to capitalize on its predecessor ’s popularity by increasing the stake , bringing Harry Osborn ’s arc to a close and give way fans more of what they ’d previously loved . unluckily , the film is now hold up as the bill boy for experience too many balls in the atmosphere . In seeking to do too much , Spider - Man 3satisfied painfully few of its objective and was a comparative failure , despite outgrossingSpider - Man 2 . In far less tangible terms , however , Spider - Man 3 was disastrous in under - dish out its own character reference .
Related : What Went Wrong With Spider - Man 3
The most popular critique unremarkably goes thatRaimi ’s Venomfeels like a betrayal of the comic lineament and that the symbiote compromises the tone of the ease of the movie . And while the scoundrel does finger tack on , that is because of Raimi ’s reluctance and manifest disinterest in using him , rather than Venom not suiting the narrative . Because , on composition , Venom is a far more appropriate while ofSpider - Man 3 ’s tale fretsaw than Thomas Haden Church ’s Sandman .
Peter Parker ’s arc inSpider - Man 3fits the overall philosophy of smashing power come with great responsibility . It offer conflict ( to a character commonly not sleep with for darkness ) in a mode that help reinforce the fundamental premiss of the trilogy . With that in mind , thesymbiote Spider - Man suitthat lead Peter to darkness is absolutely crucial and so too is Harry Osborn ’s part . With both Peter and Harry , there ’s an exploration of how traumatic past and access to power can lead to characters taking unlike paths . Osborn and Parker ’s stories mirror one another as they are both tempted by wickedness before finding the ignitor . Having them combine in their moment of divine revelation to fight Venom - the source of Peter ’s battle and near - miss fall from good will - makes utter story sense . That ’s why the often - derided " emo Peter Parker " terpsichore scene is so cunning and actually fits .
On the other hand , while Sandman is a great baddie and Church ’s performance is the best in the entire photographic film , his electric discharge gibe more with Peter wrestle with his part inUncle Ben ’s deathin the first movie . That is a huge flock and while Sandman ’s complex morality does outfit with the melodic theme of a moral spectrum , it would be better process in an altogether different Spider - Man film mirror him with a more overtly nefarious forged guy , like Vulture . Which is probably why Raimi wanted that line - up inSpider - Man 3 . distract what should have been the main theme of the threequel - Peter ’s temptation and salvation in an almost Milton - esque story - only ended up reducing the impact of SandmanandVenom ( whose change from the comics would have made more sense with the correct contextual focus ) and give James Franco’snew Green Goblinno outer space to breathe . It was n’t Venom that spoiledSpider - Man3 , it was Raimi ’s refusal to cast off Sandman ( or apply him in the proper picture show ) and the subsequent sidelining of Osborn and Peter Parker ’s twin - ground narrative .
Next : Why Sam Raimi Did n’t desire To apply Venom In Spider - Man 3
